Latest

The Federal Reserve is expected to press pause on raising interest rates Wednesday after delivering an increase last month for the first time since 2023.

Officials have signaled that the reprieve is likely to be temporary because they have more work to do to tame persistent inflation. But they have conveyed that there is no urgency to raise rates two months in a row.

Recent inflation data has complicated that message. Price pressures appear to be accelerating, rather than moving toward the Fed’s 2 percent target, a level that has been missed for nearly six years. Kevin M. Warsh, who took over as Fed chairman in May, has vowed to get inflation back to that level more quickly.

Looming large over Wednesday’s decision are next week’s midterm elections. Officials insist elections don’t factor in their deliberations, but the political backdrop has heightened scrutiny of Mr. Warsh.

The Fed will release its rate decision at 2 p.m. in Washington. Mr. Warsh will hold a news conference at 2:30. Here’s what to watch:

Return of the dissents? Officials voted 12-0 to raise rates in September, an important show of unity. The consensus is likely to have broken down if the Fed follows through with holding rates steady. Dissents could come from Beth M. Hammack, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Lorie D. Logan of the Dallas Fed or Neel T. Kashkari of the Minneapolis Fed. These three issued dissents in July when the Fed held rates steady. They voted for a quarter-point increase, citing inflation concerns.

How many more increases? According to projections released last month, most officials thought the Fed would raise rates only once more this year. Some thought further adjustments in 2027 would be necessary, but the range of views was much more diverse. Moving more gradually might mean that the Fed has to deliver additional increases in 2027 to ensure that its policy settings are appropriately tight to rein in price pressures. Roughly three more quarter-point increases are expected through the end of next year, according to federal funds futures markets.

A reticent chairman: Mr. Warsh is unlikely to share his own outlook. He is opposed to providing guidance about what the Fed might do next. By leaving the policy path so open-ended, however, he has stoked confusion. His fellow policymakers have filled the void, making the bank’s communications appear more scattered.

Market moves: Financial conditions, which track the availability of credit, have been slightly less accommodative than in the past. Yields on U.S. government debt are up sharply from a few months ago, resulting in higher borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. A tech-led stock market sell-off coupled with more costly financing for A.I. companies “may have been the first sign that the Fed’s hawkish turn is materially affecting the A.I. growth engine,” said Andrew Hollenhorst, chief U.S. economist at Citi. If Mr. Warsh leans into the idea that some of the Fed’s work has been done for it, it would suggest that he believes the Fed does not have to raise rates as much.

The issue of Fed communications is also front and center today. Warsh is an avowed critic of forward guidance and yet, a strong signal from his colleagues about there not being an urgency to raise rates at back-to-back meetings is the primary reason why investors penciled in a hold today in the face of stronger-than-expected inflation data.

If the Fed holds rates steady, as we expect, what I’m most interested in hearing from Kevin Warsh, the chairman, is his explanation of why. Warsh made a point last month of saying that the central bank sought a “timelier return” of inflation to its 2 percent target and in the weeks since the last gathering, the data has not complied. One possiblity is that financial conditions now appear slightly less accommodative. Mortgage rates are higher, equity markets are off of their recent highs and financing from companies, especially in the A.I. space, have become marginally more expensive. If sustained, there is an argument to be made that this will help the Fed to achieve its goal of bringing inflation down.

Though consumer prices continued to climb last month, the Fed is expected to hold interest rates steady on Wednesday, after a quarter-point increase last month. But a December rate increase is possible — and that could make borrowing ahead of the holiday shopping season more expensive.

Credit card rates, which closely track the Fed’s moves, have risen for the past three months to their highest level in nearly a year. The rate on a new credit card offer climbed to an average of 23.96 percent in October, according to LendingTree, which analyzes about 220 of the most popular cards from more than 50 issuers.

“Higher credit card rates just make it that much harder to contend with rising prices,” said Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at LendingTree, the online loan marketplace.

That makes good debt hygiene even more important: making timely payments, keeping debt levels manageable or paying off balances when possible. “These steps can also improve access to more favorable financing options should interest rates moderate in the future,” said Charlie Wise, head of global research and consulting at TransUnion, one of the big three credit bureaus.

After the Fed’s quarter-point increase in September, its benchmark rate is now in a range of 3.75 to 4 percent. Many consumer products, like credit cards, personal loans and small business loans, are pegged to the prime rate, which tracks the Fed’s actions, and serves as a base line to set rates.

Other rates don’t move in lock step with the Fed’s actions, but are still influenced by them. Rates on 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages, for example, generally track the yield on 10-year Treasury bonds. As of Thursday, 30-year fixed-rate loans averaged 7.32 percent, according to Freddie Mac, down from 7.40 percent last week but up substantially from 6.19 percent a year ago.

Elevated rates have helped savers, however, who have collected more in interest on high-yield savings accounts and money market funds.

The average interest rate for the 100 biggest money market funds tracked by Crane Data now stands at 3.73 percent, up from 3.51 percent at the end of August.

When Kevin M. Warsh, the Federal Reserve chairman, takes the podium for his post-meeting news conference on Wednesday, he is sure to be asked a slew of questions about the thorniest issues facing the U.S. economy.

But there is also an uncomfortable political quandary that he might not be able to avoid: a renewed attempt by President Trump to fire one of Mr. Warsh’s colleagues.

In recent weeks, the White House has redoubled its efforts to oust Lisa D. Cook, a Fed governor, over allegations of mortgage fraud that she has consistently denied. The matter is set to come to a head on Nov. 5, when the administration aims to grill Ms. Cook at an unorthodox, private hearing that her lawyers have said is politically tainted.

Caught in the middle is Mr. Warsh, who has tried to walk a fine line between defending the Fed’s independence, maintaining a good relationship with the president and steering clear of one of the most sensitive issues ever to face his institution. His next steps will carry great weight, given the stakes for the nation’s central bank and its more than century-old mission to set monetary policy free from political influence.

For the moment, Ms. Cook’s fate is unclear. Her lawyers told the White House she could not appear for the November hearing, citing scheduling conflicts and foreign travel. Since then, her lawyers and White House officials have repeatedly declined to say if they were discussing moving the different hearing date or another option entirely.

Nevertheless, the hearing itself is an outgrowth of Mr. Trump’s first attempt to fire Ms. Cook, which she successfully sued to block in a case that reached the Supreme Court. In a June ruling, the justices took no position on the charges against her, but they did say that Mr. Trump should have afforded Ms. Cook a proper chance to respond to them.

Throughout that drama, Mr. Warsh has largely refrained from commenting on the charges against his colleague — or on the president’s general attempts to pressure the Fed into lowering interest rates.

At one point during his confirmation hearing to become chairman, Mr. Warsh was explicitly asked about Ms. Cook’s lawsuit against the president. It had named the Fed board as well as Jerome H. Powell, then the leader of the central bank, as defendants, citing the fact that the Fed could have been required to carry out the firing.

Asked if as chairman he would defend Ms. Cook’s tenure, Mr. Warsh revealed little about his thinking.

“If I stand for anything, it’s the Fed should stay in its lane,” he said, citing the fact that the case at that time had not yet been decided.

He added: “It’s inappropriate for me to weigh in on that, especially because, in the event that I am confirmed, I could be a party to that matter.”

Karla Guity and her family pay just $1,800 a month for a three-bedroom house with a yard in Shoreline, Wash., just north of Seattle. The modest rent meant she did not have to work when her two daughters were young. She loves the neighborhood and the local schools.

She also worries she will never be able to leave.

Although Ms. Guity, 33, and her husband want to own their own home in the area, buying would be too much of a financial stretch as long as mortgage rates remained high. The possibility that a monthly mortgage payment would exceed $6,000 was enough to convince her that her family would stay renters for much longer than she had once thought.

“We’re depending on the graces of the landlord,” she said.

Higher mortgage rates are compelling aspiring homeowners across the country to continue renting, tightening competition for rentals and putting upward pressure on rents for the first time in years. According to private-sector data from real estate sites including Zillow and Apartment List, rents have steadied in recent months after a prolonged softening driven by a glut in new apartment buildings that sprouted up after the pandemic. Government data also show sturdier rent growth.

The upswing in rents could pose a challenge for the Federal Reserve in its fight against persistent price increases. Though the Fed is expected to hold rates steady at its meeting on Wednesday, investors anticipate the central bank will raise borrowing costs once more before year-end, which would keep mortgage rates elevated.

“We’re not in deceleration world anymore, probably not going to get a lot of disinflationary pressures from rents,” said Jonathan Millar, senior U.S. economist at Barclays. “If anything, the risks are that we may be going the other direction.”

The emerging signs of strength in the rental market follow a roller coaster of a period. During the depths of the pandemic, housing demand soared, fueled by a desire for more space, the ability to work from home and swelling savings. Without the supply to match, both home prices and rents skyrocketed in much of the country.

That demand for housing, coupled with rock-bottom interest rates, encouraged residential builders to flood growing cities, especially in the Sun Belt, with new rental properties. The mushrooming housing stock, along with generous incentives to attract renters, decreased landlords’ pricing power and compelled them to slash rents rapidly in many big cities nationwide. Rents in cities including Austin, Texas, and Phoenix plummeted in the years after the pandemic.

Then rising interest rates starting in 2022 made it more expensive to finance large construction projects, which slowed the building frenzy. Tariffs and supply chain troubles have pushed up material costs, and a labor shortage, exacerbated by President Trump’s immigration policy, has also weighed on construction. Higher mortgage rates and lofty home prices are making home buying increasingly